444Video The Full Picture

Two paths.
One route.
Zixi/SRT·SF

Both legs ride identical Peplink hardware: three cellular modems and a Starlink dish, all bonded at the WAN layer. The difference is the transport sitting on top - on the outbound, Zixi manages its own bonded delivery across the raw WANs; on the return, SRT rides a SpeedFusion tunnel that has already aggregated the links. Same route, same hardware, two different resilience architectures.

Route
Monmouth, UK ↔ Antwerp, BE
Outbound
Zixi over bonded WANs
Return
SRT over SpeedFusion
WAN Bearers
3× cellular + Starlink
01

At a glance

Aggregate, both legs
02

The journey

Click a point for detail · scrub to play through
Outbound · Zixi
Return · SRT/SF
PLAYBACK · 0% -
03

Transport behaviour

Per-sample, both legs aligned by progress %
Effective Latency over the route
MS · BY ROUTE PROGRESS
Cumulative Continuity Errors
COUNT · LOWER IS BETTER
Bonded WAN Throughput - aggregate uplink
MBPS · TX
04

Underlying link health

Both legs share identical hardware
Starlink Obstruction & uplink
% / MBPS
Active WANs over time
COUNT · 0–4
Worst-Link Packet Loss
PKT/S · ANY BEARER
05

Data per bearer

Total transferred over each leg, by underlying bearer
Outbound · Zixi
GB · TX
Return · SRT/SpeedFusion
GB · TX
06

Head-to-head

Numbers as observed; difference shown as outbound minus return
Metric Outbound · Zixi Return · SRT/SF Difference